From the public’s perspective, medical science is seen as a profound system of enlightenment offering the last bastion of hope and prospects for wellness.

From the patient’s perspective, medical science is seen as a dangerous stab at the symptomatic bulls eye.
Let’s take a ‘snippet’ of common complaints and ask what science has done to alleviate the cause.
  - Chronic fatigue? Allergies? Heartburn? Back pain?
  - Arthritis and joint pain? Autoimmune diseases?
  - High IQ’s with dyslexic tendencies?
  - Migraine headaches? Asthma?
The labels continue, and so do the maladies. 
While technical advances have been immense, the intimate understanding of body dysfunction remains as evasive as the stars do to NASA.

It is not uncommon to turn on the television and be confronted with a news flash that there has been a major breakthrough in the treatment of some debilitating disease such as cancer. 
Frequently, after all the points of research have been expounded, the last part of the news flash suggests that human trials could be up to 5 years away. Does that mean 5 years before any research is implemented?  In 5 years from the date of the news item, another news flash of misrepresentation will be beamed to millions.  

• Why is this allowed?
• Why do the media have a right to mislead the public?
• Is this the ploy of research institutions to get the ‘drop’ on opposition research?
• Do research institutions lobby the media to artificially inflate the hopes of the cancer sufferer?
• Does the cancer sufferer then lobby the medical profession to pressure the governments to accelerate the drug registration process?
• Science has an exceptional ability to promote wonder drugs to be a boon for suffering humanity.

Many drugs fail to eliminate disease processes, but excel in the promotion of human gratification.

A classical case of this would be the dollar extortion of Viagra.
Who have you spoken to that has taken time to explain the function of the parasympathetic nervous system that controls erectile function? I’m possibly safe with such a question, as it has no commercial value.
The public are brainwashed in accepting pills as panaceas for all illnesses.

The inertia follows - the patient swallows - and 10 years later the pharmaceutical company wallows.
It was never foreseen that the side affects of drug XYZ could leave a devastation trail of irreparable physiological damage, and litigious court battles.  A classic case was the thalidomide fiasco.
This hypnotic drug left a trail of severe limb malformation in the developing foetus, when taken in early pregnancy.  Science says all is fine – Time was and still is the great revealer.

Neurolink's research of the NIS system has established the neurological and physiological basis to access the brain to achieve parasympathetic potential. 
The answer is as creation intended -  Perfect.
A proficient health system could never be dependent upon:
  - Drugs, positive thinking, practitioners thinking they have special healing powers, daily exercise
    routines, age barriers, nutritional dependency.

Such a system can be achieved by using:
  - Principles that can be systematically and confidently applied to everyone
  - Being able to determine root causes of ill health that can be verified by accepted forms of
    measurement.
  - Applying values that can meet the absolute needs of the individual.
  - A complete system must be able to stand alone.
NEUROLINK® has worked hard to meet this criteria with it's Neurological Integration System.

The world is full of techniques.
A technique would describe the modus operandi or method to carry out some procedure.  Sadly, if the technique is forgotten, ones ability to move forward is dramatically compromised.
Sound principles establish a basis of healthcare that can be adopted and adapted to the needs of each patient. This should enable the practitioner to explore, and form a basis of reason and insight relating to the symptomatology.

Computers have become faster giving the ability to collate, analyse, and make strategic decisions.
Medicine too has cashed in on this technology to speed up and refine diagnostic procedures in many areas.
Satellite practices now have access to hospital files to keep the doctor on the ‘same page’ with regard to post operative care.
The turn around time for diagnostic reporting is markedly improved and in the case of cardiomyopathies, this has been life saving.

The ‘grey’ area that still struggles with enlightenment poses the historical question…What can offer superior diagnostics that will verify root causes of illness?
The brain is an open book….NEUROLINK® remains engrossed and reads on.